Make Chiangmai Mail | your Homepage | Bookmark

Chiangmai 's First English Language Newspaper

Pattaya Blatt | Pattaya Mail | Pattaya Mail TV

XII No.3 - Sunday february 10 - Saturday february 23, 2013

Around Town
Arts - Entertainment
Ask Emma
Book Review
Bridge in Paradise
Animal Welfare
Care for Dogs
Community Happenings
Doctor's Consultation
Eating Out & Recipes
Let’s go to the movies
Life in Chiang Mai
Mail Bag
Mail Opinion
Money Matters
Our Community
Quirky Pics
The Wellness Column
Daily Horoscope
About Us
Advertising Rates
Current Movies in
Chiangmai's Cinemas
Back Issues
Find out your Romantic Horoscope Now - Click Here!
Update by Saichon Paewsoongnern

Graham Macdonald, MBE MBMG International Ltd.
Nominated for the Lorenzo Natali Prize


Will UK House Prices collapse in 2013? Part 1

One thing which has been very resilient in the face of adversity is the UK housing market. Nationwide reckons that UK prices are down by more than 12%. This may not be stunning but, when compared to other countries, it is not too bad a result. As a comparison, the average cost of a house in Spain is down 31%, in America it is down 34%, in Ireland it is over 50% off its peaks of a few years ago.
Let’s face a few facts here. The UK has not exactly set the world alight with its economy. It is basically in a recession, unemployment stubbornly refuses to drop and the family earners have been hit hard with a combination of higher taxes, poor wage increases and inflation - a triple whammy.
This begs the question why has the housing market not crashed? The main reason is money is now cheap. Interest rates are very low, in fact they are as low as they have ever been. Up until the end of the Conservative government in the early 1970’s, UK rates remained no lower than 2% and no higher than 10% with an average of around 5%.
Then in 1973, global inflation forces UK rates up to almost 13% and it kept going higher until reaching its peak in 1980 at 17%. Inflation was gradually brought under control and rates slowly came down to around 5% in the mid-1990s. It stayed at about this figure for well over a decade and then things started to get interesting as the Global Financial Crisis took effect. The Bank of England (BoE) took action in early 2008 and cut rates from 5.5% in January 2008 and kept cutting until they were at 2% by December of the same year. Things did not stop there, though; three months later rates were down to 0.5% and that is where they have stayed ever since. To put things into perspective, rates never dropped this low during two World Wars or the Great Depression. The lowest they went down to was 2%.
However, the BoE view things differently these days and, according to them, we are in more economic pooh than we ever were in the first half of the last century. But at least in those days we were in charge of our own destiny whereas now we just seem to copy what the Fed does.
If this is so then why haven’t we suffered as much as them when it comes to the cost of buying or selling a house? Well, the fact of the matter is, there are more forced sellers in America than there are in the UK. Over the last couple of years the amount of home repossessions runs to just over thirty thousand per annum. This is a lot less than levels incurred during the property crash of the 1990s.
In America, things are a lot worse. Almost 100,000 homes are seized every month. There is a good reason for this number and that is much of the property financing is done via ‘non-recourse’ loans. This means that if the borrower can no longer afford to pay the loan then he/she just ups sticks and walks out. The lender then takes over the property but that is it and cannot make any further claim against assets or earnings. This cannot happen in the UK.
However, not everything goes the borrower’s way in the US. One of the more common mortgages is ‘long term fixed rate’. Compare this to the UK where it is much more usual to take out something which is more akin to short term variable rates. Thus, any cut in the base rates is of far more benefit to the UK borrowers than their counterparts in America. Despite this the UK is still in the metaphorical pooh and all this means is that it has prolonged the inevitable but necessary correction. The simple fact is that property in the UK is not exactly cheap.
Let’s look at some recent history. In the ten years that followed from 2001 the average cost of property rose by 94% whereas earnings only went up by just less than 30%. To put it in plain English, you do not need to be Einstein to see that when the former has risen by more than three times the latter then see that something is not quite right. If you look at the history of property prices then you will see that, eventually, after any large increase then they ‘revert to the mean’ and make the necessary adjustments.
It is interesting to note that The Economist reckons the prices of the UK property market are as much as 28% too high. They are not alone: Fitch - 25%; Deutsche Bank - 34%; Morgan Stanley - 25%; International Monetary Fund (IMF) - 30%. It must be said that the very low interest rates over the last few years do distort things and, as such, are keeping property prices well over where they should be. This can be seen by looking at the average rate of the UK Consumer Price Index (CPI) over the last couple of decades - this has been at around four percent. The present rate is just over 2.5%. The implication is that the correct base rate should be about seven percent per annum. However, the lenders have to make money too and will add on between 1% and 2% for themselves and this is why many mortgage rates are approximately a couple of percent over the base rate.
To put things another way, the Standard Variable Rate (SVR) should be about double of where it is now. This would mean that your mortgage payments would be double what they are now and nobody would be walking around saying there is a recovery or “the market is stabilising”. Whilst prices are not volatile at the moment it must be recognised that there is a massive underlying weakness. The amount of completed purchases is almost half of what it was five years ago. Theoretically, this is ridiculous as potential purchasers should be able to take advantage of lower prices but the lenders have been tightening their purse strings - they have returned to the pre-sub-prime era of high deposits and lower income mortgages. (Maybe they have learned something after all?)
Buyers are not the only ones with problems. The drop in the average price means that many people who bought when near the peak of the housing market cannot now afford to sell as it would mean they would get into negative equity and so sell the house for less than they paid for it. This not only affects the sale of the present property but also, potentially, any new one they want to buy since they would have to find money for the move and also cover the deposit for the next property. Not an attractive proposition when you have just had to take a hit on what you have just sold.
The problems do not stop there. The re-mortgaging of present property has dropped by more than a quarter in comparison to what it was last year. This may not sound too important but what it does do is tell us that there is not enough equity in the property to be able to re-mortgage it.
Even property owners who do not have a mortgage could be affected as prices are invariably linked to available credit so if the price of property heads south then so does the value of what you own.
To be continued…

Giving me the Creeps

Ronald Niebuhr’s ‘Serenity Prayer’ talks of having the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, and granting the courage to change what I can. It is with this in mind, that I write this article.
Ponzi schemes always succeed for a while. The inability to verify the real value of underlying assets is not the only reason for this. People genuinely want to believe in them. This is evident not just in bull market conditions, but is even more noticeable in bear markets when traditional asset classes are not performing strongly. The guy promising the steady 10% a year returns can always attract enough people who want to believe the story. If you repeat something often enough, you may even begin to believe it.
This abundance of new Ponzi’s is evident in the number of avoid (read: Avoid like the Plague) asset analyses that MBMG Asset Management has produced recently on investments built around utterly illiquid and unquantifiable underlying assets such as student accommodation, litigation funding, receivables, forestry, traded life/endowment policies, even care homes and fancy tree oil funds. The assets themselves may have value, but the investment method of many schemes distorts this over time so that a valuation gap develops. When you mark your fund pricing to model, instead of marking-to-market, an investor can be pretty sure that the number on their latest valuation is not accurate. Marked-to-model funds quote a performance, with the idea being that they retain surplus returns in good times to fill shortfalls in inflows in bad times. As long as new investment keeps coming in, they can keep paying out at the quoted price.
However, it is what happens when new investment dries up that you see the truly creepy effects of marked-to-model pricing. Investors who try to withdraw when the actual performance falls below quoted value may find that they are either prevented from doing so by a suspension of redemptions or are paid a much lower amount virtue of a discretionary reduction. This is known as a Market Value Adjustment. In a sustained period of negative performance, where the fund’s underlying asset has become increasingly divorced from the marked-to-model price, such suspensions or write-downs tend to become inevitable. This valuation gap means that it is not a question of ‘if’, but a question of ‘when’ significant investor losses will occur. This is the creeping neo-Ponzi.
Central Banks have done the same with capital markets. The valuations rely upon a model of Central Bank support and not genuine economic activities. Traded global assets have become neo-Ponzis too. As artificially priced as some of the aforementioned funds above, the question to be asking is, “What will trigger the collapse of Mark-to-Fantasy pricing?” Will it be an inflationary or a deflationary bust? When will it happen, and what should investors do?
I accept that Ponzi schemes, from Ivan Kreuger at Swedish Match in the 1930s, to Bernie Madoff and the neo-Pons of the twenty-first century, will always be around. They’ll always succeed for a while. But it never lasts. Caveat Emptor!

The above data and research was compiled from sources believed to be reliable. However, neither MBMG International Ltd nor its officers can accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the above article nor bear any responsibility for any losses achieved as a result of any actions taken or not taken as a consequence of reading the above article. For more information please contact Graham Macdonald on [email protected]


[click on headline to view story]

Will UK House Prices collapse in 2013? Part 1

Giving me the Creeps



Chiangmai Mail Publishing Co. Ltd.
189/22 Moo 5, T. Sansai Noi, A. Sansai, Chiang Mai 50210
Tel. 053 852 557, Fax. 053 014 195
Editor: 087 184 8508
E-mail: [email protected]
Administration: [email protected]
Website & Newsletter Advertising: [email protected]

Copyright © 2004 Chiangmai Mail. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.